Posted 1 month ago

I’ve decided that I shouldn’t spend money on a laptop when there are still so many children in need and adults aren’t provided with the basics. Hopefully someday children will be taken care of and adults’ll have the basics. Till then, this is goodbye. At least I know I’ll be on Tumblr in heaven. :) I’m gonna miss this. Bad. Good luck to you all.

Posted 1 month ago
Posted 1 month ago

Obamacare prompts fears for low-wage workers as employers exploit the rules

anassortmentofpolitics:

sinidentidades:

In January, a janitor in Cincinnati received a piece of chilling news from one of her superiors, who had just met with upper management. The company, the supervisor said, was considering cutting some full-time employee hours down below 30 per week in order to avoid paying for new healthcare costs associated with Obamacare.

The janitor, who asked to be called Jennifer for fear of retaliation from management, is well into her 40s and now worries for her livelihood.

After over six years of working for ABM Industries, a company worth $4bn, she works full-time for $9.80 an hour. She says that with so many bills, including several monthly prescriptions, she often finds herself so short on money that she cannot eat satisfactorily. “I want to – I need to – work full-time” Jennifer said. She is a member of the local Service Employees International Union, which has struggled to bargain with ABM for better wages and steady hours.

“Every penny counts for me,” Jennifer said. “I’m working full-time and I’m still struggling to make ends meet. If I got cut down to 20 or 25 hours … oh my God, I would have no money to live on. I wouldn’t be able to pay my bills; I’d hardly afford to eat or pay for my medication. I’d be forced to look for another job.”

“It’s not like mom’s still here – I can’t go stay with mom any more,” Jennifer added.

Her story is not unusual. Three years after the passage of Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law, labor advocates are warning that it could have the unforeseen consequence of harming some of the very low-wage employees it seeks to aid. The legislation’s incentive scheme, they say, could cause a shift toward part-time work that extends beyond companies like Papa John’s and Darden Restaurants, which last year publicized their plans to cut employee hours to avoid costs under the new law.

Such worries are reflected in California, where the state union federation is exploring legislation to lay over the Affordable Care Act to fix the potential problem. “We’re extremely concerned about the structure of employer responsibility penalties under this law” says Sara Flocks, Public Policy Coordinator for the California Labor Federation, which represents over 1,200 trade unions with 2.1 million members. “It encourages a shift toward a part time workforce in industries where that’s possible. In retail, entertainment, restaurants, and hotels, we’ll see a move toward cutting workers below the 30-hour mark.”

Most at risk of this, according to Flocks, is the so-called contingent workforce: those employees with already fluctuating hours, no job security, and little power to bargain with management. These are the workers whose hours can most easily be slashed by employers seeking to avoid paying health insurance.

Under the law that takes effect next year, large employers are exempted from contributing anything towards healthcare costs of employees who work under 30 hours a week. For full-time workers, companies must offer affordable insurance or face steep fines. Employers seeking to dodge this responsibility could impose 29-hour ceiling on workers, Flocks says, and push many onto public insurance subsidies, straining state and federal budgets.

The California Labor Federation has been quietly exploring strategies to stop this potential unintended consequence by reinforcing the ACA with state legislation to discourage large employers from cutting hours. The details of this proposal are undecided, but, at least in theory, a state law acting alongside the ACA could ensure that an employer’s part-time workers are counted toward determining how much a company must contribute to overall healthcare costs. This could eliminate the incentive to skirt the law by cutting hours.

A problem that would be solved if healthcare for adults was simply free, paid for by the government through taxes.

Posted 1 month ago
Posted 1 month ago

datcatwhatcameback:

veloxsonus:

galactic-kat:

justanotherrotgfreak:

My sentiments exactly. School is terrible but learning is awesome.

I couldn’t agree more…DAMN SCHOOL.

I learned more in two years as a free adult than I ever did in my several years of schooling.

And what did those years in school do for me? Nothing. They made my life miserable. A lot of my self despising ways were formed in school. 

The only thing school taught me was that sometimes people try to control you. 

(Source: a-dr0p-of-golden-sun)

Posted 1 month ago

thepeoplesrecord:

US law says no ‘oil’ spilled in Arkansas, exempting Exxon from cleanup dues
April 3, 2013

The central Arkansas spill caused by Exxon’s aging Pegasus pipeline has reportedly unleashed 10,000 barrels of Canadian heavy crude - but a technicality says it’s not oil, letting the energy giant off the hook from paying into a national cleanup fund.

At least legally speaking, diluted bitumen like the heavy crude that’s overrun Mayflower, Arkansas is not classified as ‘oil.’ While the distinction might normally not mean much, in the case of the disastrous spill in Arkansas it ensures that ExxonMobil will not have to pay into the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.

According to ThinkProgress, which has brought attention on the strange legal exemption, ExxonMobil has already confirmed that the compromised pipeline was transporting “low-quality Wabasca Heavy crude” from Canada’s Alberta region. That particular form of crude must be diluted with lighter fluids to evenly flow through a pipeline - it also contains large quantities of bitumen (commonly known as asphalt).

The end result is that both the US Congress and the Internal Revenue Service do not consider tar sand oil as oil at all, and thus exempt any company transporting the crude from paying an $0.08-per-barrel tax - which is the primary source of cash for the federal government’s oil spill cleanup fund.

The strange exemption of heavy bitumen crude from classification as oil dates back to a time when the extraction of tar sands on a large scale was thought improbable with then-contemporary technology. However, as oil companies developed the means to develop Canadian tar sands into a booming energy sector, the legal definition of oil has remained the same.

Funds from that same fund have already helped to clean up another spill caused by a ruptured pipeline. In 2010, more than 1 million barrels of diluted bitumen (crude oil) were spilled into the Kalamazoo River. To make matters worse, unlike conventional crude oil, bitumen heavy crude sinks. The ensuing environmental impact has made that Michigan spill the most expensive in US history, as toxic substances seeped into the surrounding soil.

There is also the fear that bitumen heavy crude could be more corrosive to pipelines than conventional crude. Lorne Stockman, research director at Oil Change International, told ThinkProgress that it’s past time for the law to be changed:

“The question is why we should continue this exemption given that it’s clear tar sands oil is more likely to spill because it’s more corrosive… and more and more tar sands is coming into the US.”

For its part the oil industry disputes the claim, and has produced scientific impact research that does not reflect higher corrosion by transporting bitumen heavy crude.

Judge Allen Dodson of Arkansas’ Faulkner County seemed to reflect the concerns of those impacted by the latest spill of heavy bitumen crude, saying: “Crude oil is crude oil. None of it is real good to touch.”

Source
Photo 12

As the Obama administration deliberates on the Keystone XL, two spills happened in the past week: this one in Arkansas & another in Minnesota, where 15,000 gallons of tar sands spilled from a derailed train. 

Posted 1 month ago
Posted 1 month ago
anassortmentofpolitics:


Despite this 14 year old girl being in need of urgent medical treatment and despite her parents paying their dues, BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina, an insurance company, is denying claims for treatment and healthcare she desperately needs.
BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina’s revenue for last year was over $5.7 billion.  Their CEO took home a bonus of $1.6 million.  There is no reason for them to deny this family their right to coverage of a $240,000 bill, especially when their daughter needs it and could die without it.  Please sign this petition and share it with those you think may be willing to add their signature to the 50,000-strong list of supporters.

Free healthcare for children is desperately needed.

The petition got signed by enough people, and it was successful! 

“After more than 60,000 people signed Amy Gleason’s Change.org petition calling on BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina to cover life-saving treatment for her 14-year-old daughter Morgan, a representative from the company personally called Amy to tell her that they will reverse the denials of all of the IVIG treatments, and treatments through October of 2013 have been pre-approved and the $240,000 bill will be erased!”

anassortmentofpolitics:

Despite this 14 year old girl being in need of urgent medical treatment and despite her parents paying their dues, BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina, an insurance company, is denying claims for treatment and healthcare she desperately needs.

BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina’s revenue for last year was over $5.7 billion.  Their CEO took home a bonus of $1.6 million.  There is no reason for them to deny this family their right to coverage of a $240,000 bill, especially when their daughter needs it and could die without it.  Please sign this petition and share it with those you think may be willing to add their signature to the 50,000-strong list of supporters.

Free healthcare for children is desperately needed.

The petition got signed by enough people, and it was successful!

“After more than 60,000 people signed Amy Gleason’s Change.org petition calling on BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina to cover life-saving treatment for her 14-year-old daughter Morgan, a representative from the company personally called Amy to tell her that they will reverse the denials of all of the IVIG treatments, and treatments through October of 2013 have been pre-approved and the $240,000 bill will be erased!”

Posted 1 month ago

Adulting: Step 291: Be supportive when your friend is searching for a job

adulting:

And now, a great guest entry from Ellen on how to not make things tougher on a friend who is unemployed and looking for a job. Ellen?

Say “how are you?” just as you would with any other person, then let him bring it into the conversation. As with any life adversity, sometimes people want to…

Posted 1 month ago